![]() |
|
|
Book review
|
||||
|
An online database of WORLD WAR II books and information
Books by subjects Book search service
Book reviews
Catalog requests
War Diary
About us
On the Web since 1995
|
Brown, John Sloan. Draftee Division: The 88th Infantry Division in World War II. Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1998.
ISBN 0-89141-666-8John Sloan Brown brings to his book a rare combination of military experience (colonel in the US Army), academic training (it began as his doctoral dissertation), and personal connection (his grandfather commanded the 88th during most of the period the book covers and his father served in it). He takes advantage of this unique perspective to bring us a thoughtfully considered analysis not only of the 88th "Blue Devil" Division's experience, butmore broadlyhow American infantry divisions prepared for war and how that preparation translated into performance during actual combat. Brown's first chapter, "Bureaucratic Roulette", traces the evolution of military theory in the US from the birth of the republic as it relates to maintaining a standing army and organizing, training, and mobilizing "militia" formations. At the time of US entry into World War II, the small cadre of regular army formations had already been filled with new volunteers and draftees to their full "expansible" size; that is, approximately double their peacetime strength. These units represented, even with their influx of draftees, the "elite" or professional "Old Army" divisions. New divisions, even when built around cadres transplanted from regular units, were another species altogether: the all-draftee divisions championed by various theorists for decades, including General George C. Marshall, Army Chief of Staff. By the last years of the war the "Regulars" had been so diluted by draftee replacements there was no longer any real distinction between divisions (except veteran vs. "green"). Early in the war, however, considerable question remained about the ability of the new draftee divisions to move from civilian life, undergo assembly-line training methods, and emerge as combat-effective units capable of defeating battle-hardened German and Japanese opponents.
The experience of the 88th Infantry Division, the first of the draftee divisions into combat in World War II, illustrates the means whereby draftees could, in fact, be quickly and efficiently converted into combat-ready units.... The 88th Infantry Division would mobilize, organize, train, and fight without unduly militarizing the soldiers from which it was madea genuinely American response to the crisis of war.
In the all-draftee division, 197 cadre officers came from the Regular Army
and 12 percent of its manpower came from its "parent" division. The 88th's
parent was the 9th Infantry Division, and the new division was
fortunate. Instead of receiving rejects (an all too familiar problem), the
88th received a fair and equitable selection of talentpartly because of
the long-time friendship of the two division COs and partly because the
88th's cadre officers carefully monitored the process. The remainder of the
division was made up of raw draftees.
Of all the logistical problems faced by the new division, inadequate automobile maintenance was the most dangerous and required the most time, energy, and adjustment to resolve. The 88th fared relatively well, for all its deficiencies. In other divisions maintenance deficiencies proved even more severe.
Brown reviews the rigorous, highly centralized training program
undertaken by the 88th and every other new division. Although utilizing
manuals and training films to an unprecedented degree, the blocks of
basic training (17 weeks), unit training (13 weeks), combined arms training
(14 weeks), and maneuvers (8 weeks) presented a tough physical and mental
challenge. Formal basic training began on 3 August 1942. The 88th departed
for maneuvers in Louisiana on 13 June 1943. There it performed so well it
leapfrogged past other units in the "readiness" standings and became the
first of the draftee divisions to move overseas.
A record for close calls seems to have been set by Pfc. Marvin Blake. Within fifteen minutes he was knocked to the ground by an artillery shell, had his rifle shot out of his hands by a sniper, lost his helmet to a machine gun bullet, and had the seat of his pants set ablaze by a phosphorous mortar round.
By the end of the "quiet" month of March, the division had suffered over
350 casualties. Non-combat casualties sent about 700 more men to the
hospital. To replace losses, the 88th relied on individual soldiers
funnelled through to them, green rookies joining unfamiliar faces right at
the front. Brown singles out this replacement system as the biggest flaw in
American personnel policies and combat practices during World War II.
What, then, can one conclude from the first three days of the 88th's first big offensive? In the strictest sense, the draftees fulfilled the promise of their training. What they had trained well to do, they did well. Techniques they had mastered through practicing time and time again in training or on maneuvers remained mastered in actual combat. Unfortunately, the converse was also true. One could have predicted the strengths of the 88th by analyzing its training program; one also could have predicted its weaknesses by reflecting on that program's omissions. Following three days of attritional struggle, the Blue Devils had ejected the German defenders from their positions. For the next two weeks they pursued the retreating enemy northward, cutting off detachments and piercing defense lines before they were fully manned. This was exactly the sort of fluid warfare for which they had been trained, and Brown rates their performance very highly. Pinched out of the line by the headlong Allied advance, the 88th then spent three days mopping up the ground previously gained. Sloan's division then re-entered the race for Rome and claims (along with several other outfits!) to have been the first Allied unit to penetrate into the Eternal City.
With the capture of Rome, the 88th came of age. It would fight as well in other battleson the Arno, in the Apennines, along the Po, and through the Alps. It would fight, take losses, lose its edge, rest, retrain, and fight again in a cycle that continued until the end of the war. All of these later battles and cycles were of great importance. It was the events of May and June, however, that were particularly held by the nation's leadership, the War Department, the newspapers, and the draftees themselves to have proved the mettle of the draftee division. The toughness of the 88th Infantry Division was no longer a question.
The last chapter of the book briefly surveys the record of the Blue Devils
in the months after Diadem and Rome, but in considerably less detail. Brown
also devotes several pages to comparing the records of the draftee
divisions based on their training cycles and "gentle" insertion into
battle. Not surprisingly, those units unable to retrain after arrival in
theater and without a period of acclimation on a quiet front did not
perform nearly as well. The author also includes an interesting appendix in
which he discusses some of the flaws in Colonel Trevor Dupuy's comparison
of Allied and German divisions.
Read and submit feedback
Reviewed 25 August 1998
|
|||
| We don't buy, stock, publish, or sell books or anything else. | ||||
| NEWS BOOKS AUTHORS PUBLISHERS SELF-PUBLISHERS BOOKSELLERS. | ||||
| bstone@sonic.net | Copyright © 1995-2008 Bill Stone | |||