LITE Initiatives

 

 Press Democrat
    12/10/04 Garbage-Exporting Idea Jeered
    12/09/04 Study: Drop Plan For New Dump, Ship Trash Out Of County
    06/24/04 County Looks for Landfill Answers

 Sierra Club
    12/04  Redwood Chapter Newsletter - Sonoma Group Report

 ZWSC
    11/04  West County Gazette

 CBS Channel 5
  8/29/05 Sonoma County Talking Trash

 

GARBAGE-EXPORTING IDEA JEERED 

BYLINE:  SPENCER SOPER , 12/10/04, PAGE: B1, © 2004 The Press Democrat

A proposal to haul Sonoma County's trash out of the county instead of building a new landfill got panned Thursday at a public meeting on long-term waste disposal issues.

Hauling trash to dumps elsewhere ranked high on a list of waste disposal options being evaluated by a San Francisco-based consulting firm in an ongoing $150,000 study.

The county generates 1,200 tons of trash daily and has been struggling to find a way to get rid of it since the discovery of ground water contamination delayed a proposed expansion of the central landfill southwest of Cotati. The landfill will reach capacity next summer, and the county is seeking long-term alternatives.

Alan Siegle, a member of a committee that advises the county on trash disposal issues, said relying on dumps elsewhere is short-sighted.

 He said there is no guarantee that landfills in Marin or Solano counties won't experience similar regulatory problems and be prevented from taking Sonoma County's trash.

``If that happens, and we don't have a landfill of our own, we're going to be in a very precarious situation,'' he said.

 Fellow committee member Don Sanders said shipping waste elsewhere threatens to undermine a ``culture of recycling'' that evolved because residents know trash generated in the county stays in the county.

 ``I think we are asking for the destruction of one of our major assets,'' he said.

 But Rohnert Park resident William Adams didn't understand the hesitation about bidding adieu to the county's trash. Shipping it elsewhere is attractive because it would eliminate the headaches of operating landfills, he said.

``As soon as it crosses the county line, bye-bye,'' he said. ``It's not ours.''

About 40 people attended the public hearing, sponsored by the county's waste division.

Contamination problems forced the county to re-evaluate its long-term plan to expand the Mecham Road landfill, which would extend its life for up to three decades, leaving time to build a new dump.

But the expansion can't go forward unless the county can persuade the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board that it can prevent contaminants from polluting ground water. Currently, the pollution is being captured on the dump site and there is no evidence it is spreading to surrounding residential areas, county officials said.

Even if expansion is possible, building a new landfill would be expensive and difficult, according to Brown & Vince, a consulting firm hired by the county in August.

``In Northern California, there's been one new landfill opened in the last 15 years,'' consultant Mike Greenberg said.

The consultants emphasized that their ranking is preliminary. They intend to narrow the list of alternatives by next month and then conduct more thorough economic studies.

Other options include building a facility that would convert trash to energy and increasing recycling to the point that a dump is unneeded.

Due to complications with expanding the dump, the county has been hauling 400 tons of trash a day to the Potrero Hills landfill in Fairfield since April. In July, when the landfill on Mecham Road is expected to reach capacity, it will begin hauling all its trash to other counties.

Ken Wells, the county's integrated waste manager, said the previous long-term waste plan assumed that the existing landfill would be available for many years, allowing time to plan other options. That changed when the expansion was delayed, he said.

``We don't have 10 years to develop a plan,'' Wells said. ``We really need to make a decision.''  

Top

STUDY: DROP PLAN FOR NEW DUMP, SHIP TRASH OUT OF COUNTY

BYLINE:    DONNA HOROWITZ , 12/9/04, PAGE: A1, © 2004 The Press Democrat

Sonoma County should abandon long-standing plans to build a new landfill and instead haul its garbage out of the county, according to a new study.

The report, released six months before the county landfill is expected to reach full capacity, calls for a dramatic change to county policy. Currently, the county is planning to expand its landfill near Cotati and later build a new dump elsewhere in the county.

However, the county faces formidable regulatory hurdles and political obstacles to building a new landfill, said Ken Wells, integrated waste manager for the county.

The $150,000 study, prepared by a San Francisco consultant, lists an array of options to deal with the the county's garbage.

 ``We have to make decisions right now,'' Wells said.

The study will be presented tonight at a public workshop in Santa Rosa by the county Transportation and Public Works Department.

The recommendation that the county permanently truck its garbage to other dumps in the Bay Area drew fire Wednesday from an environmentalist on the county's solid-waste task force.

``It's something we've opposed for a long time and will continue to oppose,'' said Don Sanders, a Sierra Club representative on the advisory board.

``Every jurisdiction should be responsible for their own waste and not ship it to someone else,'' he said.

The county is re-evaluating its longstanding plans to build a new landfill because of the difficulty of containing contaminants at its current dump, the Central Disposal Site in the hills southwest of Cotati.

Last summer, contaminants from decomposing trash were found seeping through a plastic barrier that lines the dump, although there has been no sign of toxins tainting ground water.

The county has been planning to expand the dump. But the project has been delayed after state regulators called for improvements to contain leaks.

Because of the delays, the county began in April hauling 400 tons of trash each day -- or about a third of its garbage -- to Potrero Hills in Fairfield.

In July, it will begin trucking all of its trash, or 1,200 tons a day, outside Sonoma County when the landfill on Mecham Road is expected to reach capacity.

With the dump filling up, the county hired Brown, Vence & Associates of San Francisco to look at its plans for handling garbage and develop proposals.

The study concluded that building a new landfill was the least attractive option of eight alternatives.

Finding a new location for a dump would be controversial because neighbors would likely object, Wells said.

In addition, state water-quality regulators would likely reject the project, he said. There would be a ``high risk of regulators saying no'' to a new landfill, Wells said.

Bob Tancreto, water-quality control engineer with the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, denied that his agency imposes impossible hurdles.

``You have to demonstrate you're not going to pollute the ground water and it costs money to do that,'' he said.

Trucking garbage outside the county could make sense for Sonoma County, Tancreto said. Other counties in the region have taken similar actions to avoid polluting ground water.

``It's pretty much what other counties in the high rainfall areas (on the North Coast) have decided,'' he said.

The study does not contain cost estimates for any of its alternatives. The options range from sending trash out of the county to expanding the dump to privatizing the landfill.

A detailed economic analysis will be conducted once those scenarios are whittled down to two to four options, Wells said. That information would be presented at another workshop, tentatively set for Jan. 18.

Ultimately, the county Board of Supervisors would have to decide whether to abandon plans to build a second dump and send trash outside the county.

Supervisors also could decide to forgo expanding the current dump. The landfill could accommodate garbage for 10 to 30 more years if it is enlarged, Wells said.

Hauling trash out of the county would result in ``very little if any'' rate increases to residents, Wells said. It could be cheaper to truck garbage outside the county than to build a landfill, he said.

``There's quite a bit of landfill capacity in Northern California,'' Wells said. ``We probably could get a pretty good price.''

The county's trash would most likely be taken to Redwood Landfill in Novato, Keller Canyon in Antioch or Potrero Hills.

Although county supervisors had not seen the report Wednesday, Supervisor Mike Kerns said he was not surprised by its conclusions.

``It's very possible if we entered into a long-term, fixed rate with another landfill (outside the county), we could get a pretty good rate,'' Kerns said.

``I'll be interested to see the alternatives and the cost estimates,'' he said. ``There's a lot of information that needs to be disseminated and evaluated.''

Top

COUNTY LOOKS FOR LANDFILL ANSWERS

(Correction: For the Record published June 24, 2004 Sonoma County is thinking about creating a trash digester that would convert garbage to methane, which in turn could be burned to produce electricity or used as vehicle fuel. A story on Wednesday's Page B1 incorrectly described the type of facility under consideration.)

BYLINE:    SPENCER SOPER , 6/23/04, PAGE: B1, © 2004 The Press Democrat

With the Sonoma County landfill approaching capacity, alternatives ranging from finding a new dump to building a $50 million trash-burning power plant were presented Tuesday to the Board of Supervisors.

A third option, presented at a board workshop, is to haul the 1,200 tons of trash generated daily to another county for disposal. All three options present obstacles, such as high costs or public outcry.

``My first reaction is golly gee, we're in trouble,'' Supervisor Paul Kelley said at the end of a staff presentation regarding garbage issues.

Supervisor Tim Smith said he was especially worried about building another dump.

``It's like siting a nuclear power plant,'' he said. ``No one wants it.''

Mounting trash-disposal problems have forced the county to reconsider its long-term waste management plan, which was built around dumping trash in the 33-year-old landfill in the hills southwest of Cotati.

Ground water contamination at the Mecham Road dump has delayed a proposed expansion of the landfill, which could be full next year.

Because of the ground water issue, the board is considering scrapping the expansion plan and seeking an alternative for trash disposal.

About 50 people, including local trash haulers, city officials from Rohnert Park, Windsor and Cloverdale and neighbors of the dump attended the meeting.

The neighbors said the ground water contamination should be a message that it isn't the best location for a landfill and the county should look elsewhere to dispose of its waste. They said potential contamination issues at the dump undermine their property values and threaten their ground water supply.

``The central landfill site is not a good site for a landfill because of its ground water issues,'' said Cathy Henrick, who lives near the landfill.

Investigate costs

Supervisor Mike Kerns, whose district includes the landfill, said he likes the idea of shipping Sonoma's garbage to a private dump somewhere else, and wants to know what that would cost.

But Smith and Supervisor Mike Reilly said they were skeptical of dumping the issue to the private sector, which could lead to rate hikes over which the county would have little control.

``I'm very skeptical about simply shipping all of our garbage out of county,'' Smith said.

Supervisors took no formal action, but directed county staff to come back with more information at a future meeting. County officials said they will seek a consultant to help evaluate the options.

Regardless of the direction the board takes, it will be necessary to haul all of the county's trash out of county for up to two years even if the central dump is expanded, county officials said.

The meeting comes as the county is struggling to appease state water quality officials about ground water contamination at the Mecham Road dump.

Last summer, contaminants were found leaking through a protective barrier that is supposed to prevent the dump from polluting ground water.

Leak prompted new demands

The leakage prompted the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board to demand that the county redesign a proposed 14-acre landfill expansion on which work was supposed to begin in October. Before permitting the expansion, state officials want a thicker liner, made of plastics and layers of clay, to better contain contaminants from the dump, which county officials maintained was unnecessary.

Because of the expansion delays, the county in April started hauling 400 tons of trash each day -- about a third of the garbage collected in the county -- to a dump in Solano County. Dump fees will go up in July to cover those costs, and trash haulers can pass their cost increases along to customers.

The rate hikes prompted Petaluma to begin hauling its trash to the Redwood Landfill in Marin County to save money, and Rohnert Park is considering that move as well.

The move upsets Sonoma County officials, who say it threatens to unravel a countywide garbage pact and drive up rates for cities that continue to use the central Sonoma County landfill.

Top

SONOMA COUNTY TALKING TRASH
Aug 29, 2005 5:15 pm US/Pacific

Jeffrey Schaub, Reporting

(CBS 5) Next week, Sonoma County will begin exporting one of its dirtiest problems. The county jail will start sending its trash to other communities in the Bay Area.

Every day, the county will haul 65 truckloads of waste to other regional landfills. The current landfill in Cotati takes in 1300 tons of garbage every day. Over two years, that's enough to fill the entire Oakland Coliseum from top to bottom.

County plans to enlarge the existing landfill fell through after water quality officials put a halt to the project. Inspectors found a small sewage leak at the edge of the mammoth facility, so they decided to shut down expansion. Now, there is no more room for solid waste at the dump.

"There is a real strong sentiment on the part of the people in Sonoma County that they want to take care of their own," says Susan Klassen of Sonoma County. "They don't want to off their problems on other counties."

But other counties will be taking on Sonoma's trash beginning Labor Day. That's when huge trucks will travel along highway and county roads to deliver the waste to existing landfills in the area. Fairfield, Suisun City, Livermore, Pittsburg and Novato will become dumping grounds for Sonoma trash.

Mike Kerns is a Sonoma County Supervisor. He worries about the impact on the environment. With more trucks wearing down Bay Area roads, and belching diesel fuel, his worries may be reasonable.

"It's rather frustrating actually," Kerns says. "We're just behind a rock and a hard place right now."

The county's position is a costly one. Sonoma will have to shell out $15 million dollars a year to truck trash around the Bay Area. The average household in Sonoma County will pay $4 to $5 more a month for trash collection. But the problem is not just a North Bay issue. Landfill space is being eaten up all around the bay.

"Our concern is that when you talk about ten years from now, all of these jurisdictions in the Bay Area will be competing for what landfill space is left," says Klassen. "It could be a real supply and demand issue that drives up rates."

(© MMV, CBS Broadcasting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Top