Article 31 of 40

Subject:      Re: Limitations of Lewis' apologetics- Morality
From:         Sam Dodsworth <sam@aristos.demon.co.uk>
Date:         1997/02/02
Message-Id:   <OzWVgDAZGP9yEwqB@aristos.demon.co.uk>
Distribution: world
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: aristos.demon.co.uk
References:   <5carbl$3i4@btc1.up.net> <5cbodr$ua@netnews.upenn.edu>
Organization: Annexia Free Press
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:   alt.books.cs-Lewis



In article <5d181a$7r2@news.acns.nwu.edu>, "Joshua W. Burton"
<jburton@nwu.edu> writes
>Sam Dodsworth <sam@aristos.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I'm a materialist (I think - I've never seen a formal definition)
>
>A materialist believes that mind is an emergent property of certain
>complex configurations of matter.  Oppose `dualist', who believes
>that both mind and matter are numinal, and `idealist', who believes
>that matter is a perceptual construct of mind.
>
Then I'm a materialist. Thanks for the definition.

Sam Dodsworth (sam@aristos.demon.co.uk)
"I think there should be more sex and violence on television, not less. 
 Both are powerful catalysts of social change, at a time when change is
 desperately needed."
                        -J.G. Ballard