Path: ultra.sonic.net!miwok!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!aristos.demon.co.uk!aristos.demon.co.uk!sam From: Sam Dodsworth Newsgroups: alt.books.cs-lewis Subject: Re: Difficulties with "Miracles" - no quantum mechanics Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:54:50 +0000 Organization: Annexia Free Press Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <6OaIvAAhyy$yEwvI@aristos.demon.co.uk> <5dphbf$9pj$1@nuacht.iol.ie> NNTP-Posting-Host: aristos.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: aristos.demon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 3.01 <7c0azr3XvpMr4dZzpifF$I+pPf> Lines: 18 In article <5dphbf$9pj$1@nuacht.iol.ie>, Douglas Gresham writes >One should be very careful of saying that something >is wrong, merely because we do not happen to be able >to understand it. > Yes. But an argument that doesn't follow a valid chain of reasoning is an invalid argument and its conclusions are false. I think that I _do_ understand Lewis' "argument" on the connection between Supernaturalism and Theism, and I don't think it's valid. If you think I've misunderstood anything then I would be grateful if you would explain where and why. Sam Dodsworth (sam@aristos.demon.co.uk) "I think there should be more sex and violence on television, not less. Both are powerful catalysts of social change, at a time when change is desperately needed." -J.G. Ballard