Path: ultra.sonic.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!news.walltech.com!newsfeed1.aimnet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!aristos.demon.co.uk!aristos.demon.co.uk!sam From: Sam Dodsworth Newsgroups: alt.books.cs-lewis Subject: Re: Fundamentals Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 11:42:17 +0000 Organization: Annexia Free Press Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <01bc1da4$b4b787a0$LocalHost@#metanoi1> <5ei5bc$1ct@jupiter.dnai.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: aristos.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: aristos.demon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: Turnpike Version 3.01 <7c0azr3XvpMr4dZzpifF$I+pPf> Lines: 16 In article <5ei5bc$1ct@jupiter.dnai.com>, Daniel Drake writes > >As I asserted in another posting, it's not clear that losing determinism >makes any real difference in the problem that Lewis had (and I've >gradually come around to sharing) with the ground-consequent relation. > I'm still wondering if losing determinism doesn't just leave us with the old problem of solipsism - which would apply equally to Lewis' brand of Supernaturalism. Any thoughts? Sam Dodsworth (sam@aristos.demon.co.uk) "I think there should be more sex and violence on television, not less. Both are powerful catalysts of social change, at a time when change is desperately needed." -J.G. Ballard