August 15, 2001, Oakland Tribune
By Josh Richman
STAFF WRITER
A new federal lawsuit has frozen the impending transfer of the
Casino San Pablo card room into an
Indian tribe's hands for conversion into a Nevada-style casino.
The Lytton Band of Pomo Indians, a landless 220-member tribe with
roots in Sonoma County, could
have taken possession of the 9.5-acre tract at San Pablo Avenue
and San Pablo Dam Road as early as
this week, if not for this latest salvo in a legal battle stretching
from a federal courtroom in Sacramento to
Capitol Hill.
"Everything is basically on hold," Michael Franchetti, attorney
for the Lucky Chances card room in
Colma, said Monday.
But Tony Cohen, the Lyttons' attorney, said this "hold" was incorrectly
applied and might not last long. "I
expect once the Bureau of Indian Affairs has a chance to act,
they will promptly move to dispose of this
and to rescind the extension of time they've given the card clubs."
The Lyttons are close to taking over Casino San Pablo only because
U.S. Rep. George Miller,
D-Martinez, added one paragraph deep within last year's 76-page
Omnibus Indian Advancement Act.
That paragraph ordered the government to put Casino San Pablo
into trust for the Lyttons, helping the
tribe bypass the years of bureaucratic review such a move ordinarily
requires.
Card rooms and charities which fear they'll be run out of business
by a full-fledged casino in the Bay
Area filed their first federal lawsuit in February to challenge
the plan's constitutionality.
And U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev. and majority whip -- egged on
by his state's gaming industry -- has
penned an amendment to repeal Miller's amendment and put the
Lyttons back at square one. Reid's
amendment has passed the Senate but still must go through a House-Senate
conference committee's
review before it can reach the president's desk. Congress won't
reconvene until September.
Still, the Bureau of Indian Affairs in July published a order
that would put Casino San Pablo into trust for
the Lyttons. Such an order can't be executed until 30 days after
it's published; that clock would've run
out Monday, had it not been stopped last week.
The Interior Department's policy is that if someone sues to stop
the placement of land into trust for a
tribe, the department can voluntarily postpone the transfer until
the lawsuit is resolved.
In this case, Cohen said, the department last week agreed to stop
the clock just before the card rooms
actually filed their new lawsuit challenging a technical aspect
of the transfer. That was a mistake for two
reasons, he said.
First, Cohen said, the policy only applies to transfers made at
the Interior Secretary's discretion;
Congress ordered this transfer, leaving no such discretion. Second,
the Interior Department can
voluntarily postpone a transfer only after finding the same factors
a court would have to find in order to
issue an temporary injunction.
Those factors are a likelihood the card rooms' lawsuit will eventually
succeed; irreparable injury the card
rooms will suffer if the transfer goes through now; substantial
harm other parties will suffer if the transfer
goes through now; and the public interest.
"I think they lose on all four branches of the test," Cohen said
Monday, adding he believes the Interior
Department -- which saw the card rooms' new lawsuit only after
agreeing to the voluntary postponement
-- soon will recognize it as frivolous and withdraw the postponement.