| Profile
FuelCell Energy, Inc. is a developer of
electrochemical technologies for electric power generation, and has
developed a proprietary patented fuel cell known as the Direct
FuelCell. A fuel cell is a device that electrochemically converts
the chemical energy of a fossil fuel into electricity without the
combustion of fuel. The fuel cell system feeds a fuel, such as
natural gas, into the fuel cell where the fuel and air undergo an
electrochemical reaction to produce electricity. The Company
manufactures carbonate fuel cells, generally on a contract basis.
Revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1999 were $20
million, compared with $24.3 million the previous fiscal year.
The Company concentrates its efforts on the development,
demonstration and commercialization of the Company's patented
carbonate fuel cell for generating electricity. Different types of
fuel cells are distinguished generally by the electrolyte medium
they use. The Company's Direct FuelCell system employs metal
carbonates as the electrolyte. The Company's fuel cell system feeds
a fuel, such as natural gas, directly into the fuel cell where the
fuel and air undergo an electrochemical reaction to produce
electricity without the need for complex reforming equipment to
create hydrogen gas from the fuel. A fuel cell power plant can be
thought of as having two basic segments, the fuel cell stack module,
which is the part that actually produces the electricity, and the
balance of plant, which includes various fuel handling and
processing equipment, including requisite pipes and blowers,
computer controls, inverters to convert the DC output of the fuel
cell to AC, and other related equipment.
The Company has been working on the development of its Direct
FuelCell technology under contracts since 1977, with various
government agencies in addition to the DOE, including the Department
of Defense, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Company currently
receives its government funding primarily under a long-term
Cooperative Agreement with the DOE. The Company's revenues have been
principally derived from United States government and industry
research and development contracts and license fee income.
Government funding provided approximately 87%, 97%, and 92% of
revenues in fiscal 1999, 1998, and 1997 respectively, principally by
the DOE.
The Company has also been active in soliciting other business
from industry and government organizations. The Company has been
working on Direct FuelCell power plants for marine applications
under contracts with the United States Navy and United States Coast
Guard. In 1999, the Company received an award from the DOE to
develop a high temperature membrane to overcome some of the
shortcomings of present generation polymer electrolyte membrane fuel
cells. The Company also has received several Small Business
Innovation Research grants and research contracts from various
organizations to explore advanced concepts or new applications of
fuel cells. The Company has also licensed its fuel cell
internationally to several major corporations, including
MTU-Friedrichshafen GmbH, a subsidiary of DaimlerChrysler.
Because of the non-combustion, non-mechanical power generation
process, the Company's fuel cell is much more efficient than the
conventional power plants. Emissions of sulfur and nitrogen oxides
are nearly zero, and other pollutants are minimal or non-existent.
With the only moving parts being the air blower, in contrast to
large rotating turbines, fuel cells are extremely quiet. In
addition, fuel cells achieve high efficiency at extremely small
sizes, allowing fuel cells to satisfy market needs for distributed
generation, such as providing electrical power to a hospital or a
retail store.
The Direct FuelCell uses hydrocarbon fuel without the
intermediate step (reforming) of creating hydrogen fuel, which is
more efficient, simpler and less costly, as compared with other
external-reforming type fuel cells. The Direct FuelCell has been
successfully demonstrated using a variety of hydrocarbon fuels
including natural gas, methanol, ethanol, bio-gas, diesel and coal
gas. The Direct FuelCell operates at higher temperatures than most
other fuel cells. As a result, less expensive electrocatalysts can
be used, and high quality heat energy is available for cogeneration.
Even though fuel cells are believed to be superior to conventional
generators in terms of efficiency, environmental characteristics,
and flexibility of size, commercial sales of fuel cells have been
minimal to date.
In further efforts to develop the Direct Fuel Cell for
commercialization, the Company built an integrated power plant
facility that can operate Direct Fuel Cell stacks up to 400 kW. A
long-term endurance test on a 10-cell stack with the new cell
hardware has completed over 13,000 hours of operational testing. The
stack has met the performance stability goal for the Company's
market entry product. In addition, an internally insulated stack
enclosure has been designed and fabricated. The enclosure eliminates
the need for inert stack environment gas, and provides for a much
more compact arrangement of each stack within the multistack
modules.
To date, the Company has operated two full height stack
demonstrations. Power conversion efficiencies from pipeline natural
gas to DC electricity of up to 47% has been achieved. Since the test
facilities are optimized for flexibility instead of efficiency, this
achieved efficiency level should translate to more than 50%
electrical efficiency in commercial operation, and more than 75%
employing cogeneration. Ruggedness of the product design was
demonstrated in planned stress tests, such as rapid ramp-up and
thermal cycle tests. Another test simulated emergency fuel loss,
verifying that the Direct Fuel Cell stack can be maintained in the
field cost-effectively despite fuel supply or power failures,
without hampering performance. To date, a total of more than
1,250,000 kWh have been produced using a stack, which began
operation in March of 1999. Total operation time has exceeded 7,500
hours, including four thermal cycles.
Recent market research has indicated that the demand for fuel
cell power plants from early commercial adopters of the technology
may be greater in the sub-MW size than the larger sizes. To meet
that demand, the Company plans to take advantage of its license
rights to the Hot Module fuel cell developed by MTU. This nominal
250kW design, which incorporates the Company's fuel cell stacks,
uses an innovative integration of some of the elements of the
balance-of-plant with the fuel cell stack module, with the
expectation of reducing costs to the power plant as a whole. The
design is very compact and specially suited for cogeneration
applications.
During 1999, the Company delivered fuel cell assemblies to MTU
for a field demonstration of the Hot Module design at Bielefeld, a
municipal utility in Germany. The cogeneration plant was
successfully commissioned in November 1999, providing up to 225 kW
of electricity and the by-product of high quality heat, at an
overall thermal efficiency exceeding 75% feeding 80,000 kWh to the
grid, as of December 1999. An additional demonstration of a hot
module cogeneration plant is planned in Germany during 2000. This
plant, as before, will use Company supplied fuel cell assemblies.
The Company also plans to conduct its own field trials of a 250 kW
unit at a host site selected by Los Angeles Department of Water and
Power. Additional United States field trials are planned for late
2000. The Company is currently revising MTU's design to comply with
United States codes and standards.
The Company competes with other companies involved in fuel cell
development. In the United States, M-C Power Corporation is engaged
in the development of carbonate fuel cells. In Japan, at least six
manufacturers have demonstrated interest in developing and marketing
carbonate fuel cells, including Mitsubishi Electric Company. In
addition to the carbonate fuel cell, other types of fuel cells are
also being developed by such companies as ONSI Corporation and
Ballard Power Systems.
|