WHAT THEY CALLED "CIVIL WAR":
Fight Scenes
| Overview
Real War Grounded Networks Control Networks A Note on Then and Now What They Called "Civil War" Liberal Projects J.R. Poinsett Levi Woodbury Francisco Morazán V. Gómez Farías Wm. Lyon Mackenzie Conservative Demagogues Andrew Jackson A. L. de Santa Anna Fight Scenes El Gallinero Puebla & Charleston Guanajuato & Bravo Loot & development Texas & Florida Grounded Reaction Guatemala & Carrera Lower Canada The Huasteca, & North The Costa Grande Outcomes, and Vision |
Commanders in that Civil War were opportunists. Whether they
were "centralists" or "localists" at any time depended on where they found
themselves in the strategic layout of the continent.
Consider Tolomé, the "first" battle in what was called Civil War, early in 1832:
Troops, sent by the war department, were marching doggedly from the interior. This force reached the edge of the coastal plain, at a point on the main highway near Santa Anna's own hacienda (Manga de Clavo). Santa Anna, still the "rebel" general with local knowledge, led a small force quietly by night around the government troops, to the village of Tolomé, where he planned to attack those troops from a position astride their lines back inland. One of his own men fired prematurely. The government commander, now forewarned and with artillery on heights that commanded Santa Anna's lines back to Veracruz, made his own pre-emptive attack, and with an enormous numerical advantage. Santa Anna's soldiers men fought back (or fled) instead of surrendering.
His force was practically wiped out, even while it inflicted enough casualties
that the victors could not move quickly on. Santa Anna himself fled
back to Veracruz. The government force followed, but floundered through
weeks into months outside the city, as spring approached, bringing the
lethal yellow-fever season. With no immunity against the disease, this force was
now the one to flee, back to the upcountry. Santa Anna had time to start
over again, building up strength for operations inland.
|
Tactical considerations, everywhere, pushed commanders to make a short-term choice, taking sides between the "interior" or the "exterior" end of lines of communication. Longer-term pressures, in all parts of the continent, pushed commanders to resolve this same tension through political deals -- which meant through understandings among rival economic interests.
The time-line of the War wound around the changing economic structure of the continent:
[Although the legal content of the South Carolina position was anti-centralist and therefore "liberal," the strategic content was centralist. Both South Carolina and Bustamante were defending an interior landed base against forces that might come in from the periphery of the country.]
References:
Copyright 1999 The Intermountain History Group, intermtn@sprynet.com.
All rights reserved.