Oaxaca and indigenous law
| Overview
Inputs from the Politics of Today
|
For a time, early in 1998, the state of Oaxaca
was taken as a show-case, a demonstration that it was possible and practical
to recognize indigenous identity within the framework of a modern nation.
The governor of the state, Diodoro Carrasco, was backing changes in the
state constitution that would give greater recognition and autonomy to
indigenous municipalities. In earlier times, these Zapotec and Mixtecs
-- and others -- would have constituted the "República de Indios."
They now sought a collective standing that they had not had since the colonial
years, or since the Constitution of 1824 declared all Mexicans equal before
the law.
One institution that the new arrangement would support would be the tequio, under which all members of a traditional community were expected to volunteer for collective service. This institution had been anathema to 19th-century liberals in Mexico, as they tried to replace rigid custom with a free, individualistic society. It still ran contrary to the formal ideology of the government party, the PRI, and to the neoliberalism that the PRI has been accepting under recent presidencies. Now it was a PRI governor who was sponsoring the new or new/old approach, and taking credit for it. Carrasco is himself a spokesman for economic modernization, going out to the wider world to drum up interest and investment. Presiding over a state that has a large indigenous population, he knows that discontent might discredit the project of modernization. But modernization would mean "integration" of all groups into the society,
and integration might mean assimilation or homogenization. Within the state
legislature, the governor's reforms could be attacked by those who considered
them a disloyalty to the Mexican state. Outside, they were often
attacked, with some sadness, by those who found them simply one more way
to incorporate Indians into a picture-book equality. The actual meaning
of any new indigenous autonomy would depend on how it was administered,
and for what purposes.
|