

JUST SAY NO to $1.7 Billion
for State-Sponsored Terrorism in Columbia
by Mark Weisbrot
Mention Colombia, and the first thing most Americans think of
is drugs, and second violence. What most people don't realize is that there
are more than ten times as many political murders in Colombia as there are
drug-related killings. And these political murders are being funded with
US tax dollars.
The Clinton administration upped the ante with a proposal for $1.7 billion
of "anti-drug aid," widely acknowledged to be indistinguishable
from other military assistance to the government of Colombia over the next
fiscal year. And now peace talks that were supposed to resume between the
government and guerrillas have been postponed.
$1.7 billion is an enormous amount of money to fight an extraordinarily
dirty war that most Americans know nothing about. Even at the height of
President Reagan's war in El Salvador in the 1980s, US spending did not
reach that amount.
The Colombian war is very similar to the 1980s war in El Salvador (or Guatemala,
for that matter). As in the Salvadoran war, most of the victims are innocent
people--labor leaders, peasants, and even human rights workers. They are
killed by the government or its allies, who often use hideous torture and
mutilation in order to discourage opposition political activity. And most
of the murders and atrocities are carried out by paramilitary groups with
close links to the army and police. This allows the Colombian government
to deny responsibility, and US officials to pretend that they are aiding
a democratic government.
These methods were brutally successful in El Salvador, from Washington's
point of view. After literally killing off most of the opposition's leaders
and organizers, it is now possible to have national elections in which even
former guerrilla leaders can run, without risk that anyone upsetting to
US officials or their local allies could win.
Washington's problem in Colombia is that the guerrillas are much more entrenched,
for various historical and geographical reasons. The two main guerrilla
groups now control about half the national territory, and can blow up oil
pipelines whenever they want.
These realities--as well as the overwhelming popular desire for an end to
the war--have convinced Colombian President Andres Pastrana to pursue peace
negotiations, which began in January. But Colombia's military, its drug-rich
and commercial elite, and of course the paramilitary death squads want to
pursue a "Salvadoran" solution--fight the rebels while killing
and terrorizing their potential supporters among citizens' organizations
that are seen as "subversive."
The social and political causes of the war cry out for a negotiated solution.
Seventy percent of the land is owned by 3% of the population, and 42% of
children do not make it to the fifth grade. In the 1980s, an amnesty was
granted so that the left could participate in the political process, but
those who did were murdered at a rate of one every 39 hours.
The United States has been less than supportive of the latest peace overtures.
Our government informed Pastrana that the demilitarized zone that he created
as a concession to the rebels must not get in the way of anti-drug activities.
But the paramilitary death squads, as everyone knows, are much more tightly
linked to big-time drug traffickers than the guerrillas--yet this does not
seem to concern US officials.
The facts of the Colombian situation are well-known. Human rights groups
in this country--including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch--and
even our own State Department recognize that the Colombian government is
responsible for the overwhelming majority of the 35,000 political murders
committed there over the last decade. The Colombian army has publicly stated
that its targets include civilians across a broad array of citizens' organizations
that it considers "subversive." And our own government has pretty
much given up the pretense that its military aid is supposed to be used
for "anti-drug" activities, as opposed to taking sides in this
dirty civil war.
Yet we are about to give Colombia $1.7 billion in military aid. Our military
is now sharing intelligence with theirs, oblivious to the atrocities that
may be committed with the help of this information.
For 78 days, American planes bombed Serbia, supposedly to defend the human
rights of the Kosovars. Now who in Congress will stand up for the human
rights of Colombians by saying no to this latest billion-dollar installment
to a government that rules its people by means of terror?