

"FIXING" SOCIAL SECURITY
by Sam Smith
Thanks to amazingly successful propaganda about the state of
the Social Security trust fund, members of the media, politicians and millions
of Americans have become convinced that the fund is soon to go broke. According
to the actuarial figures, this just isn't so--unless we have depression
level economic growth in coming decades.
So you don't believe us? Okay, but will you take a former trustee of the
fund and ex-labor secretary? In the American Prospect Robert Reich states
flatly, "Social Security is not endangered." Says Reich, the actuarial
prediction is "based on the wildly pessimistic assumption that the
economy will grow only 1.8 % annually over the next three decades. Crank
the economy up just a bit, to a more realistic 2.4% a year (what the actuary
gloomily termed the "high option projection) and the fund is flush
for the next 75 years."
Incidentally, 2.4% growth is exactly what the White House budget predicts
for the next five years.
Here are some other healthy, handy things to do to take your mind off the
Great Social Security Scam:
· Switch from a wage based tax to an income based tax. And make it
progressive while you're at it. That way Tim Russert and Cokie Roberts and
Pete Peterson will be contributing more to Social Security and talking less
about it. Social Security was a radical idea in New Deal days and a regressive
wage tax was one way to make it more palatable to the high rollers of the
time.
·Hire the head of a health insurance company to run the Social Security
program. The New York Times reports that health insurance companies are
planning to increase premiums up to five times the rate of inflation. Maybe
they could show the Social Security how to find a little more money as well.
·Put the defense budget in a trust fund and let the Pentagon go bust,
too. No one but a bunch of politicians said you had to fund Social Security
out of a trust fund. And you can tell them that they're wrong.
·Worry about things that we really can't replace--like oil--or that
we can't abuse indefinitely-like the environment.
·Bear in mind, according to the GAO, even if you threw 70% of trust
fund assets into the stock market, you'd only buy yourself another eleven
years or so.
·In the end, whether there is enough money for Americans in their old
age is a matter of political choice, not economic destiny. If we demand
that the money be there (rather than spent on missiles or corporate welfare)
it can be there; if we allow ourselves to be scared by those who want us
to accept a lower standard of living, it won't be.
·Ask your favorite media why it never tells you things like this.
·And remember: The bottom twenty percent of American senior citizens
get roughly 80% of their income from Social Security. Without Social Security,
nearly 70% of black elderly and 60% of latino elderly households would be
in poverty.
WHAT THE MEDIA WON'T TELL YOU ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY
Excerpts from a statement by Jeff Faux of the Economic Policy Institute
to the White House Conference on Social Security:
·The projection of bankruptcy is based on the assumption of recession-level
growth rates--less than half the average for the past 75 years.
·If this projection is correct, calculates Doug Henwood of the Left
Business Observer, and if the projection of privatized returns in the stock
market is also correct, then stock P/Es in the year 2075 would be at least
178 as opposed to 26 today and half that in the past. In other words, the
Social Security hustlers are predicting economic gloom for the trust fund
but a boom for the market.
·The SS trustees have steadily lowered their projections of growth.
Henwood points out that the trustee's most optimistic projection in 1998
matches their most pessimistic one in 1981. If you use the middle projection
for 1986, for example, you actually end up with the trust fund being comfortably
in the black.
·One way to shore up the trust fund is to raise the salary ceiling
for SS taxes. One reason this is never mentioned: it would hit the pocketbooks
of those who are having the most to say on the subject.
·Some of the fear concerning SS is based on the presumed burden of
a growing older population. But the non-working population not only includes
the old but children as well. When you look at the total projected dependent
population, the burden becomes roughly equivalent to that of Kennedy's time.
·The SS trust fund is an accounting creation, the artificial nature
of which contributes to the current hysteria. If SS were being funded out
of general revenues (like the Pentagon or the war on drugs) you would not
be hearing talk of it "going broke" but simply about how much
more it was going to cost.
·If the system is privatized not only do you face the interesting problem
(as James Glassman has pointed out) of the government being one of the owners
of anti-trust target Microsoft, NBC, and Philip Morris, you also have the
potential of the government using its stake to directly manipulate the markets.
There are reports of this having already occurred, but the large sums of
money available under privatization would make the temptation even more
appealing.
·If you want an example of the hazards of government investment in
the market you need look no further than WJ Clinton himself. As governor
in the mid-80s, Clinton and his banker, Jackson Stephens, put a big chunk
of the state pension fund into high risk investments. The brokerage firm
involved suddenly went belly-up and the state pension fund dropped 15% overnight.
Facing a $52 million loss, Clinton was saved by his ubiquitous buddy, Mochtar
Riady, who stepped in and bought 40% of Stephens' Worthen Bank in the months
immediately after the disaster. The national media never covered this revealing
story.
LEFT BUSINESS OBSERVER: http://panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html
--Sam Smith is editor of The Progressive Review, 1739 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington DC 20009, (202) 232-5544/(202) 234-6222 Fax ssmith@igc.org <http://prorev.com>
For a free trial subscription to both bi-monthly hard copy and regular e-mail
updates, send e-mail and terrestial address to ssmith@igc.org

Spring 1999-- NCX
Home -- Archives -- Electrons
to the Editor