

THE CIA AND TORTURE ON THE RECORD, PART 2
by Jon Elliston
In January 1997, the CIA released the "KUBARK Counterintelligence
Interrogation" manual, its 1963 guidebook on Interrogation methods
for inducing mental and physical agony. Part 1 of the overview appeared
in the Winter 1998 NCX.
THE MIND CONTROL CONNECTION
The 1963 CIA guidebook on interro-gation was one of thousands of government
efforts to apply behavior science expertise to military and intelligence
objectives deemed crucial in the early years of the Cold War.
By 1963, when the manual was authored, the CIA counterintelligence staff
had a sizable foundation of government-funded psychological research on
which to base their guidebook. In fact, the manual asserted, this knowledge
"is of sufficient importance and relevance that it is no longer possible
to discuss interrogation significantly without reference to the psychological
research conducted in the past decade" (p. 2).
The manual does not explain that many of the "relevant scientific findings"
that had become so useful for interrogators were the product of covert funding
from the CIA. The bibliography of source materials for the manual is laced
with the names of scientists involved with project MKULTRA, the secretive,
multimillion dollar program of experiments in mind and behavior control.
It is impossible to state definitively how many of the authors in this bibliography
were recipients of MKULTRA funds, as the CIA has destroyed and withheld
many records on the program. Other specialists listed in the bibliography
received Pentagon grants for similar mind-control research.
The published works of some of the CIA's most experienced and relied upon
scientific contacts were put to use in the interrogation manual. Two noted
Cornell University medical researchers, Harold Wolff and Lawrence Hinkle,
authored the CIA's first major study on the indoctrination of prisoners
of war. During the 195Os, "the team of Wolff and Hinkle became the
chief brainwashing studiers for the U.S. government," according to
John Marks, author of the definitive account of the CIA's mind control program.
Two of the most enthusiastic academic participants in MKULTRA, Wolff and
Hinkle were the president and vice-president, respectively, of the Society
for the Investigation of Human Ecology, a CIA front organization.
Posing as a non-governmental scientific foundation, 1955 -1965, Human Ecology
channeled CIA funds into dozens of MKULTRA studies. One researcher financed
by Human Ecology, Harvard's Martin Orne, examined potential applications
of hypnosis in interrogation. A chapter summarizing his research forms the
basis of the ClA manual's discussion of the uses of hypnosis (pp. 96-98).
Another Human Ecology grant went to Air Force researcher Albert Biderman
to fund his study of "Social Psychological Needs and 'Involuntary'
Behavior as Illustrated by Compliance in Interrogation"--another article
referred to in the manual.
The CIA also sought help from John Lilly, a prominent researcher of the
effects of sensory deprivation. Lilly declined the offer of an MKULTRA contract,
but one of his studies is cited in the interrogation manual nonetheless
(see pp. 96-98).
Further evidence of the CIA's leading role in applying modern psychological
research to interrogation is found in the manual's list of "other bibliographies"
(p. 121). A 1960 report used to prepare the manual, "Brainwashing:
A Guide to the Literature," was published by none other than the Society
for the Investigation of Human Ecology.
Given the manual's repeated instructions to probe and exploit the individual
mind-frame of the subject--to place "a tap on the psychological jugular"--it
would not be surprising to find that yet another MKULTRA project, the PAS,
was incorporated into CIA interrogation strategies.
THE TERROR TRADE
The CIA was loath to release its manuals to the American public, but the
agency has readily shared its expert opinions on interrogation with military
and intelligence forces around the world. In numerous cases both the CIA
and the Defense Department have been implicated in the international dissemination
of torture and other political terror tactics. The tricks of the trade were
often exported to governments who turned the brutal methods against their
own civilians. U.S. involvement in this terror trade has been so widespread
that its effects can accurately be described as global in scope.
Most recently, the CIA has come under scrutiny for its training of abusive
officers in Guatemala and Honduras--a sampling of the agency's experience
in promoting the use of political terror in Central America. During the
1980s one of the agency's major covert operations--the contra war against
Nicaragua--was repeatedly plunged into scandal due to its reliance on tactics
that blatantly contradicted President Reagan's public praise of the contra
guerrillas, whom he described as a force of "freedom fighters."
A CIA-produced manual, Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare, schooled
the contras on the use of "implicit terror," kidnapping and assassination.
U.S. Army instruction programs that spread similar methods in the region
are also attracting criticism. According to declassified documents and Defense
Department reports, the Army's "Project X," a set of intelligence
courses taught since the 1960s in countries throughout Central and South
America, included instruction on how to surveil, infiltrate, and undermine
dissident groups. The training covered the use of kidnapping, blackmail,
and executions. The materials were later consulted in the preparation of
manuals used at the Army's School of the Americas (SOA), a Ft. Benning,
Georgia, facility that trains Latin American military officers. Among the
objectionable tactics later found in the SOA manuals were instructions on
the use of hypnotism and "truth serum" drugs in interrogation.
Rep. Joseph Kennedy, a longtime congressional critic of the SOA, remarked
that the manuals "taught tactics that come right out of a Soviet gulag
and have no place in civilized society--they certainly have no place in
any course taught with taxpayer dollars on U.S. soil by the members of our
own military." Amnesty International issued a statement calling for
full disclosure of the history of Project X and commenting that "it
seems highly unlikely that it is merely a coincidence that some of the most
widespread and systematic human rights violations have taken place in precisely
those countries--Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and
Peru--where these materials were most widely used."
By virtue of their proximity to the United States, these countries bore
the brunt of the abuses that accompanied U.S. counter­p;insurgency aid-but
the manuals and lesson plans that shared such tactics were extensively distributed
outside this hemisphere as well. In March 1997 the Washington Post reported
that according to army documents and former pentagon officials, the Project
X materials "were used much more widely, by U.S. personnel working
in a variety of countries," including Vietnam, Japan and Iran.
CIA ties to torturers have likewise reached every corner of the globe. The
agency created and guided oppressive security programs in several Southeast
Asian countries, most notably Vietnam, where the United States ran its most
intensive counterinsurgency campaign. During the late 1960s, the CIA set
up the infamous Phoenix Program to eradicate the Viet Cong infrastructure.
Phoenix is largely remembered as an assassination program (at least 20,000
suspects were murdered), but the operation also established a network of
"Provincial Interrogation Centers" that often served as torture
chambers. In the years that followed, the advanced counterinsurgency tactics
of Phoenix were shared with thousands of foreign police officers trained
by CIA instructors in various programs run by the State Department's Agency
for International Development (AID), including the Office of Public Safety
and the International Police Academy.
The CIA has also been directly linked to torture-training in the Middle
East, where the agency for two and a half decades reinforced the repressive
state of Shah Mohammed Pahlevi, the dictator of Iran. Shortly before the
Shah's overthrow in 1979, New York Times journalist Seymour Hersh reported
that "a senior CIA official was involved in instructing officials in
the Savak [the lranian secret police] on torture techniques." Jesse
J. Leaf, a former head Iran analyst for the CIA, told Hersh, "I do
remember seeing and being told of ClA personnel who were there seeing the
rooms and being told of torture. And I know that the torture rooms were
toured and it was all paid for by the U.S.A."
The human rights abuses promoted by the Pentagon and CIA are compounded
by the abuses of government secrecy that continue to conceal many important
records on these operations from public scrutiny. In the case of the Project
X program, the Defense Department says it has destroyed almost all of the
original documentation, purportedly to prevent further dissemination of
such unacceptable tactics.
When such crucial records are wiped out of existence, our ability to document
the history of U.S. military assistance and training programs is seriously
impaired. Fragmentary media reports based on the recollections of former
Pentagon officials are no substitute for a complete accounting of Project
X. Likewise, neither the CIA's declassification of a couple of incriminating
manuals nor its "scrub" of its motley band of foreign assets is
a substitute for a comprehensive Congressional investigation of CIA cooperation
with regimes that regularly employed terror tactics.
Though much of the documentary evidence remains shielded by official secrecy,
a close reading of this manual reveals the value of the pieces we can currently
examine.
The "KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation" manual is available
only through ParaScope, 1430 Willamette #329, Eugene, OR 97401, (Email:
EASTERISLE@aol.com (541) 686-5771, <www.parascope.com/>

Spring 1999-- NCX
Home -- Archives -- Electrons
to the Editor