Much Ado About...Something? A Humorous Essay/Parody by Dawson E. Rambo Disclaimer : Fox Mulder, Dana Scully, Walter Skinner and any other tangentially mentioned characters created by Chris Carter remain his copyrighted property, the property of 1013 Productions, and the property of Fox Television, a unit of 20th Century Fox, Inc. No infringement of any copyright is intended. Characters created by the author remain his property. Original Post : July 8, 1997 Archive Entry : "Much Ado About...Something?" Classification : Humor/Parody Rating : PG (Adult themes) Archive : Any public accessible server. Feedback : All feedback (good or bad) to: drambo@sonic.net ENJOY! ------------------------ I tend not to read alt.tv.x-files. It seems, sometimes, to be nothing more than a never-ending junior-high school lunchroom discussion about which rock group is better than another, who `likes' whom, and whether or not that mean `ol teacher Mr. Carter is going to give a really, really hard test, or just a really hard one. But it's the summer, and I find myself with some actual vacation time on my hands, and I decided to peruse the newsgroup again to see if I could pick up any rumors about the movie, the fifth season, or just the general state of X-Philedom. I need to stop here and point out a few things. I am a shipper. ("Hello, I'm Dawson R., and I'm a Shipper." Crowd: "Hello, Dawson.") I am also, in conjunction with that and separate from it totally, a hopeless romantic. The reason I am bringing this up will become clear in a moment. I ran across a thread that was another flavor of the "Do They Or Don't They" variety. You know what I'm talking about. The Eternal Question. Well, there could be an argument made that there are several Eternal Questions when it comes to "The X-Files," amongst them the always- favorite-but-no-less-vapid "Is CSM Mulder's father?" or "Is the Blonde UN Chick Samantha?" I'm talking about The Big One here, folks. Is there UST? For the uninitiated, UST is the Philes shorthand for "Unresolved Sexual Tension." There seems to be a few different schools of thought on the entire UST issue. There are those that are 100% sure that it exists, that can point to specific episodes, scenes and lines of scripted dialog. There are those that think it may be there, like aliens, but can't prove it. It's something so invisible, so mysterious that they would like it to be there, but if prodded to cite an example they just throw up their virtual hands and give the `ol "Well, if it ain't, it oughta be!" answer. And then there are those that deny it exists, that say the relationship between Mulder and Scully, while complex, invigorating and at times downright confounding, is nothing more than a highly-developed case of "brother-sister affection." Allow me at this time to send a raspberry to those that think nothing exists between Our Favorite Duo. Several immediate scenes come to mind, as well as some deeper investigation of the scenes, the below-the- surface stuff that both sides seem to love to use. So, your honor, with your permission, the defense would like to present its case. The next part of this essay is delivered as a courtroom transcript. Cast of characters: ME: Moi, the defense attorney. Think of that cute guy in "A Time To Kill." P: Prosecuting Attorney. Think of a large cockroach wearing a suit. J: Judge. Older, wiser, very, very smart. Citation #1: "Fire." The defense calls John T. Blindman to the stand. ME: Mr. Blindman, you have watched the X-files since the first episode, is that not true? JB: That's true. ME: Very good. So you would consider yourself an expert on The X- Files? JB: I suppose so. ME: Wonderful, wonderful. Now, sir, if I may, I'd like to ask you a few questions about your life. JB: Uh... ME: Sir, do you have any siblings? JB: Yes. Two sisters and a brother. ME: And you are...the oldest? JB: Yes. Me, my two sisters, and then my little brother. ME: Quite a little family you have there, sir. I'm sure you're very proud of them. JB: Why, yes. Yes, I am. ME: Wonderful. Sir, are your sisters lesbians? P: OBJECTION! That is totally irrelevant! J: (Gaveling wildly) Mr. Rambo! Mr. Rambo! ME: Your Honor, if I may be allowed to continue, I will make this relevant. J: (Eyeing me suspiciously) Very well, Mr. Rambo. Quickly, please. ME: Of course, your honor. Mr. Blindman, if you please? JB: Huh? ME: Your sisters. Are they lesbians, sir? JB: No, of course not. ME: So, they dated boys when they were in high school. JB: Of course! ME: How wonderful for them. Sir, were you ever jealous of your sister's boyfriends? JB: Excuse me? ME: It's a fairly straightforward question, sir. Your sisters dated. They had boys coming around the house, boys that wanted to squire your sisters away to parts unknown, maybe to the movies, maybe to the local lover's lane where they could sit and neck for hours, all those teenage hormones fogging up the windows. Surely you thought about it. You did think about it, right? JB: Well, sure, I thought about it. I'm the oldest. ME: Of course you did. Concerned brother and all that. But were you jealous? JB: Of what? ME: Were you jealous that those boys got to kiss your sisters and you did not? JB: Of COURSE NOT! That's sick! P: Your Honor! ME: Almost finished, your honor. Now, Mr. Blindman, I direct your attention to Defense Exhibit 1013. It is the shooting script from an episode titled "Fire." JB: (Picks up script) ME: Would you mind reading the highlighted passage? JB: (reading) "Dana Scully - So that's what you were leading with." ME: Thank you sir. Now, would you please characterize that statement? JB: I don't understand. ME: What do you think...what is your personal opinion of what emotion that statement characterizes. What emotion was Dana Scully feeling at the moment she spoke those- P: Objection! Your Honor, those remarks are taken out of context! ME: (Smiling) Your Honor, I am shocked! Twenty minutes of law training, and I forgot to set the groundwork. By all means, Mr. Blindman, please tell us under what circumstances those words were spoken by Ms. Scully. P: (Sensing the trap) Your honor! J: Sorry. You opened the door by objecting to the context. Mr. Blindman, please describe to the court and this jury the context of that statement. JB: Uh...Scully has come to a hotel. She sees her partner dancing with an old girlfriend. ME: An old girlfriend. A potential love partner, wouldn't you say? JB: Excuse me? ME: Well, we can go over the script line-by-line, but we both know that the characterization of Phoebe Green was of a woman still on the prowl for Fox Mulder. Is that not true? JB: I guess so. ME: So, sir, I put it to you this way. If any reasonable person saw that scene as it was written and acted, what would they assume? JB: (Shrugging) That she was jealous. ME: Thank you. You have stated that you were not jealous of your sister's boyfriends. Is that correct? Do you need me to read it back? JB: No, I wasn't jealous. ME: So, then, sir, if Scully was jealous of Phoebe...wouldn't it be fair to say that any reasonable person might assume that she has feelings for Mulder that can be described as `other' than sisterly feelings? JB: Uh... ME: The defense has no further questions for this witness. P: (Slumps at his desk, head in his hand.) Citation #2: "Pusher." A favorite relationshipper episode. Has lots of oogy moments of touchy-feely and all kinds of stuff. This is a favorite target of both sides of this argument because there is so much left unspoken by the two characters that both sides have ample ammunition to make their point. The anti-UST types argue that it's natural for someone as close as Mulder and Scully to hold hands at the end of the episode. That it's perfectly ok for this to be happening with no, repeat no, none, zero, zip, nada, zilch sexual tension underlying the entire affair. I now use their own argument against them. I call to the stand one Roscoe P. Coldheart, the fictional aggregation of all anti-UST types. What follows is the cross examination of this witness. ME: Mr. Coldheart, it is your opinion that Special Agent Dana Scully and Special Agent Fox Mulder do not have any `unresolved sexual tension,' between them. In fact, sir, it is your contention that there is no sexual attraction period between them, is that correct? RC: That is correct, sir. ME: Very well. I have just a few more questions. Would it be fair to say, sir, that you feel that Dana Scully, while being a Medical Doctor and a Special Agent of the FBI is a forthright, professional woman? RC: Yes, sir. ME: Further, would it be true to say that being a woman in the FBI, which is, as we all know, basically one of the largest Old Boy Networks in the world, not an easy task? RC: I would suppose so. Not being a woman, it'd be hard to- ME: Just yes or no answers, please. RC: Yes, I guess. ME: Thank you, sir. Now, further, if I may, would you say that Dana Scully's career is important to her? RC: Yes. ME: And that anything she would do to damage that career would not be in her self interest? RC: No, it would not. ME: Mr. Coldheart, what do you think would be the reaction of her fellow agents were they to see Special Agent Scully holding hands with her partner? P: Objection! That is not a yes or no question! ME: Your honor, I ask for a little leeway here. J: Get wherever you're going quickly, Mr. Rambo. Objection overruled. ME: Mr. Coldheart? RC: I'd assume that they'd be upset. ME: Upset? RC: That she would be...a typical woman. Or what they assume to be a typical woman, falling in love with her partner. ME: I see. Falling in love with her partner. So, sir, it would be safe to say that since you maintain that she is not in love with her partner, that in fact, she harbors no sexual feelings or attraction towards him, that she must have a very good reason indeed to hold his hand in a public place in full view of other agents should they happen upon the partners? RC: I'm not sure I understand. ME: I'm sure you don't. Allow me to rephrase the question. You said earlier that Dana Scully is a professional woman in a career that is not very forgiving to women. Would that be a fair assessment of what you said earlier? RC: Yes. ME: Very good, sir. So, if she were to hold her partner's hand, in public, where anyone could see her, risking damage to her valued career...she must have had a very good reason, wouldn't you say? RC: Yes, that would make sense. ME: Very well. Since you maintain that there is no sexual tension or attraction, that in fact, Ms. Scully is not in love with her partner, would you care to speculate as to what that reason might be? RC: (long, silent pause.) Uh.... ME: (moving from podium back to the Defense table) I have no further questions for this witness. P: (Standing) Your Honor...the defense has shown two anecdotal incidences of what could be perceived as sexual tension between two fictional characters! I'm sure that any reasonable person would assume that two law-enforcement professionals engaged in the type of work that Special Agents Scully and Mulder are would be able to control their feelings- ME: Your honor, I don't here a question in there anywhere... J: Mr. Prosecuting Attorney, do you have a question for this witness? P: Well, no, but- J: The witness is dismissed. You may step down. Citation #3: "Cockroach Episode." The defense recalls Mr. Blindman to the stand. ME: I'm sorry to drag you back here, sir, but when going over your depositions, I noticed something that I would like to explore further. You mentioned that your most favorite episode of all time was the one dealing with the cockroaches. Is that a true statement, sir? JB: Yes. I loved that episode. ME: As did we all, Mr. Blindman. I would like to direct your attention o Defense Exhibit 1013. he shooting script for that episode. JB: (picks up script.) ME: Please describe to the jury the scene that I have highlighted starting on page 32. JB (Reads) It's the scene where Mulder calls Scully at home and she gives him this huge speech bout anti-Darwinism. ME: Correct. Now, sir, what is the line that Mulder speaks? The one highlighted in hot pink? JB: (reading) "Scully, what are you wearing?" ME: Sir, assuming you were a woman, what would that statement mean to you? JB: I'm not a woman, counselor. ME: Correct, sir. The defense will stipulate that you are a man. Now, sir, if a woman had spoken that phrase to you, what would you think? JB: That she wants to know what I'm wearing? ME: (Confused) Why would a woman want to know what you were wearing, sir? JB: I don't know...(shrugs) ME: Let's look at this another way. Assume you weren't wearing anything when the question was asked. Assume you were naked. Do you think if you told the woman who had asked you that question that you were naked that it might have an...effect on them? JB: I suppose. ME: Further, might we stipulate that the purpose of certain types of clothing is to flatter the wearer, to make them more physically appealing to other people? JB: I guess so. ME: So, then, to ask the question is to beg another, unspoken question: Are you wearing something that I would like? Something that I would like to see you in? Would that be a reasonable assumption? P: OBJECTION! Assuming facts not in evidence! ME: Your honor, we are talking about the assumptions of reasonable persons. I will stipulate for the record that I consider Mr. Blindman here a reasonable person, unless the prosecution has any objections to THAT. P: But-but-but-but- J: Overruled. ME: Mr. Blindman, would that be reasonable to assume? JB: I guess. ME: You guess. Sir, have you ever asked a woman on the phone what she was wearing? JB: (pauses) Yes. ME: I see. Why did you ask that question? JB: Because I wanted to know what she was wearing. ME: I see. And was she wearing something that you'd like? JB: (pause) Yes. ME: Very well. Thank you, sir. Now, moving on, I direct your attention to the last several pages of the script. Please read the highlighted line for the jury. JB: (Reading) "Scully says, `This is no place for an entomologist.' ME: Sir, would you characterize that line? P: Objection! Taken out of context, your honor! ME: If the prosecutor wants me to have the witness read the prior scene and the stage directions, I'm sure the jury would like to know the exact- P: Objection withdrawn. ME: Now then, sir. Would you please characterize the statement? JB: She was...I don't know how to say it... ME: Establishing her territorial rights? P: Objection! He's leading the witness! ME: (smugly) You're right, I am. I apologize to the court, to His Honor and the jury. Now, sir, would you say that the statement I made a moment ago is a reasonable characterization of the line? P: (Muttering) He set me up! JB: Yes, I guess. ME: Sort of like...what? A girlfriend fending off the advances of another woman? Would that be reasonable? P: (Whining) Your honor! ME: I withdraw the question. Sir, taking a look at the entire episode, would it be fair to say that Scully was concerned for her partner? For his safety? P: That's two questions, your honor. J: Sustained. ME: (Sighing) Very well. Sir, do you think that Special Agent Scully was concerned for her partner's safety? JB: No, I don't think so. ME: Oh? Then why did she come? Why did she leave her comfy apartment in Annapolis to go to her partner? JB: I don't know exactly why. ME: I see. Well, let's look at this from another viewpoint. The case was not exactly life-threatening, is that correct? I mean, as long as Mulder didn't get any roaches on him, he'd probably live. Is that a fair statement? JB: Yes, it's not like some of their other cases. ME: Exactly, sir. It wasn't like some of their other cases. But, aside from the lack of the threat of immediate loss of life on Mulder's part...what else was different? JB: Uh... ME: Your honor, please direct the witness to answer the question. JB: Bambi. Bambi was different. ME: How so? JB: Mulder was obviously...interested in this woman. ME: I see. On what do you base that statement, sir? JB: When Scully called him on the cell-phone and Mulder gave her that, "Not now" answer and hung up on her. ME: Sir, do you have any sisters? P: Objection! Your Honor, are we going to go there AGAIN? ME: Your honor, if the Prosecution will stipulate to the same circumstances as the previous witness, I will not ask the question again. P: So stipulated. My client has two sisters, and neither one of them is a lesbian. J: Please continue, Mr. Rambo. ME: So, sir, I ask you: Your sister Susan, she is married. You must have called her on the phone once or twice in your lifetime? JB: Of course. ME: So, then, has she ever hung up on you? JB: Yes. ME: Were you concerned? JB: No, but she's not an FBI agent in the middle of a case- ME: IN the middle of a case with a beautiful entomologist that goes by the name "Bambi,' sir. JB: No. ME: Nevertheless, we have established that Mulder was not in danger, that Scully thought the entire case was nothing but fluff, and yet, once the introduction of Bambi had taken place, Special Agent Scully left her apartment in Annapolis, drove to the site of the case, and then made what can only be described as a territorial claim on her partner. Now, sir, I put it to you. Does that sound like a woman who only considers Mulder a friend or a brother? JB: No, I guess not. But-- ME: But what, sir? JB: But they CAN'T! They just CAN'T be that way! It'll RUIN THE SHOW! ME: I'm sure some would disagree with you, sir. The defense has no further questions for this witness at this time, but I do reserve the right to recall him at a later time. (two days later) J: Mr. Rambo, are you ready to give your closing argument? ME: I am, your honor. (Turns to jury) Ladies and gentlemen, we have seen a case where the prosecution insists that there are no unresolved sexual feelings between Special Agents Dana Scully and Fox Mulder. They have trotted expert after expert out, some of them from the television industry, those same experts claiming that to bring Mulder and Scully together in a romantic relationship would ruin the show. But those experts did NOT testify as to whether or not those feelings existed, just what effect they thought such feelings would have on the show. We have heard from the creator of this show, who has said that there will never be a romantic relationship between them on television. Again, the creator of the show also did not testify that the feelings were not there, just that they would never be consummated. We have heard from witnesses that claimed at the beginning of their testimony that they believed the relationship between Mulder and Scully to be that of friends, of siblings, but after examining those opinions, TO A ONE they all agreed that the depictions we have seen of those two characters do not match those of friends OR siblings. The question then arises naturally: If these two characters do have more than friendly or sibling-like feelings for each other, then WHY have they not consummated this relationship? Why has there been no breathless declaration of love? Why no steamy love scenes to fog the camera's lens? Perhaps that is a question better left to the executives that create and produce this show. Perhaps they know why. I do not. I don't pretend to. Perhaps they have decided not to let the characters consummate the relationship at this time because it would detract from other issues. But the prosecution has not provided a single, solitary witness that has been able to prove that the feelings do not exist. Similarly, we have not been able to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they DO exist. All we have been able to do is provide evidence, overwhelming evidence, that they might. This is important, ladies and gentlemen. Please try to understand: We have seen a pattern of activity that the prosecution's own witnesses have testified does not fit the pattern of a brother/sister relationship, OR that of `just' friends. There is something more there. Is it love? We do not know. But the logical assumption is that there is something there, there is something more between Special Agents Fox Mulder and Dana Scully than just partners and just casual friends. When you go into that jury room, I want you to think about what you see on that screen every week. It doesn't matter if you think the feelings SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be there. Your personal opinion on the rightness or wrongness of two people who work together having romantic, sexual feelings for each other is NOT at issue here, ladies and gentlemen. The only question before you is: DO THEY EXIST FOR THESE TWO PEOPLE? I thank you for your time. J: Mr. Prosecutor, would you like to make your closing argument? P: (Crying) N-n-no, your honor. (nine minutes later) Foreman: We, the jury, in the above entitled action, after due and careful deliberation, find that although there is no overwhelming evidence to prove either point, we are inclined to believe that a situation of unresolved sexual tension, also defined as `lackanookie' under Article 1013 of the Broadcast Standards Law, does, in fact, exist. (Gallery explodes in applause.) (Outside, on steps of courthouse, to swarming press mob) ME: Thank you, thank you. I'll be taking on the case of "The Simpsons" versus "Rand McNally" next week. THE END