Legislative Update 1
NEW AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICE LAWS IN EFFECT FOR 1999
In 1998 the California state legislature passed two new laws affecting
ambulance and ambulance transport services(AB984 and AB1899). Effective
January 1, 1999, these bills require that ambulance and ambulance transport
services provided through "911" emergency system (911) are covered as part of
the basic health services provided to all members.
Other requirements set forth in AB984 are as follows:
- On or before July 1, 1999, disclosure materials must include a statement
- encouraging enrollees to use 911 appropriately.
- Health plans are prohibited from requiring prior authorization for
ambulance services provided through 911.
- Health plans cannot refuse to pay for any ambulance or ambulance transport
service if the enrollee reasonably believed that the medical condition was an
emergency that required ambulance transport services.
- The determination as to whether an enrollee reasonably believed that the
medical condition required an emergency response may not be based solely upon
a retrospective analysis of the level of care eventually provided to, or a
final discharge of, the person who received emergency assistance.
- Health plans are not required to pay for ambulance services if any of the
following apply:
- the health plan determines that the services were never performed,
- an emergency medical condition did not exist,
- fraud or an incorrect billing was discovered,
- the service was not covered under a member's current benefit plan,
- an enrollee's membership was invalid at the time of service.
Legislative update II DRUG FORMULARY DISCLOSURE LAWS TAKE EFFECT
In 1998 the California state legislature passed two new laws requiring health
care organizations to provide drug formulary information when requested.
The laws implemented on July 1, 1999 give consumers the right to review the
drug formulary of a health plan and inquire about the availability of
specific medications(Inclusion of a drug on the Health Plan formulary does
not guarantee that the drug will be prescribed for a specific condition.)
The new laws also provide for the coverage of a nonformulary medication if a
Plan physician determines that the drug is medically necessary.
Legislative Update III
IRS CHANGES STANCE ON SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAMS & PRESCRIPTION DRUGS IN
RELATION TO HEALTHCARE SPENDING ACCOUNTS
The Internal Revenue Service(IRS) recently revoked Revenue Ruling 79-162
which stated that smoking cessation programs are generally not deductible
under Internal Revenue Code(IRC) 213, and were not reimbursable under a
healthcare spending account. Revenue Ruling 99-28, set out on June 10, 1999,
states that costs associated with participation in smoking cessation programs
as well as cost associated with smoking related prescription medications are
now deductible medical expenses under IRC 213.
Furthermore, smoking cessation program expenses and smoking related
prescription medication expenses can now be reimbursed through a healthcare
spending account. Note that, like other over the counter medications, over
the counter smoking cessation medications are not reimbursable even if
prescribed.
Legislative Update IV
HIGHLIGHTS of the NEW HEALTHCARE BILLS SIGNED INTO LAW YESTERDAY
REVIEW:
The Department of Corporations must establish an independent medical review
system for patients to dispute claims when treatment has been delayed,
denied, or modified by their health plan.
GRIEVANCES:
Healthcare plans must provide enrollees with written response to grievances
and expedite the review and appeals process.
LAWSUITS:
Patients have the right to sue a health plan for harm caused by failure to
provide quality care.
SECOND OPINIONS:
Healthcare plans must provide a second medical opinion upon request by the
patient.
PRIVACY:
The unauthorized selling, sharing or use of medical information for any
purpose not necessary to provide healthcare is prohibited.
REFERRALS:
Deadlines are now established for health plans to respond to physician
requests when a patient is referred to a specialist.
BREAST CANCER:
The screening, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are now covered.
Also, enrollment cannot be denied because of a personal or family history of
breast disease or breast cancer.
MENTAL ILLNESS:
Health care plan contracts must cover the diagnosis and medically necessary
treatment of severe mental illnesses at any age and serious emotional
disturbances of children.
CONTRACEPTION:
Disability insurers and healthcare plans must expand outpatient prescription
drug benefits to include Federal Drug Administration approved contraception
methods.
HOSPICE:
This is added as part of the basic healthcare services that must be provided.
NEW AGENCIES:
The state department of managed care will be devoted exclusively to the
licensing and regulation of healthcare plans. A new office of the patient
advocate will assist consumers with their rights and grievances.
Legislative Update V
NEW COBRA REGULATIONS GO INTO EFFECT JANUARY 1, 2000
Changes in the design or carrier of a medical/dental plan must be offered to
Cobra beneficiaries(persons on Cobra continuation).
There is a new term, "non-Cobra beneficiary" which replaces "active employee"
in several parts of the regulation. These non-Cobra beneficiaries are persons
who receive coverage other than by reason of COBRA, and who are in a
situation similar to a Cobra beneficiary (e.g. disabled employees, divorce
decreed benefits, etc.).
The new classification "non-Cobra beneficiary" brings up an important new
regulation.
If the employer offers two plans to non-Cobras beneficiaries, and decides to
eliminate one plan without giving the beneficiary the right to enroll in the
remaining plan, then that non-cobra beneficiary must receive a Cobra notice
and the right to enroll in the other plan.
If a Cobra beneficiary changes his/her/their place of residence, coverage
under Cobra could be lost.
If the employer uses a regional insurance provider, not licensed to do
business in the state to which the Cobra beneficiary moves, then the employer
has no obligation to continue Cobra. The cobra beneficiary has the
responsibility to obtain coverage elsewhere. However, if the employer also
offers a self-insured plan not governed by the state to which the beneficiary
moves, then that plan must be offered to the cobra continuant.
The clarification of the regulations says that even employees who voluntarily
leave, reduce hours or terminate have Cobra continuation rights. In the past
some employers interpreted the regulations to mean that loss of coverage had
to be involuntary.
The IRS has flip flopped (highly unusual) on the Medicare/Cobra eligibility
issue.
The 1987 regulation stated that if Cobra beneficiaries were eligible for
coverage from another group plan, then Cobra would not have to be offered,
and if offered, could be terminated. The new regulations say that if an
individual has any coverage, including Medicare, at the time of the
qualifying event, then Cobra must be made available. Previously the Cobra
beneficiary's coverage ended when he/she first became entitled to Medicare
regardless of whether or not enrollment occurred. Now, coverage can only be
terminated if the Cobra beneficiary becomes covered after the date of the
Cobra election. The regulations states that "entitlement" means actually
being enrolled in Medicare Part A or B. In other words, eligibility for
Medicare is not a reason to terminate Cobra coverage.
What coverages can the employer require the Cobra beneficiary elect?
Final regulations eliminate the concept of core versus non core benefits. If
an employer has one plan document or plan for a multiple of coverages, and
the plan document describes the plan as a "single" plan, then the employer's
Cobra notice can require participation in "all plans, or none." If each Cobra
eligible plan has its own document, and does not defined all plans as being
"one plan," then each plan must be offered separately. For example: A Cobra
beneficiary must take prescription drugs when it is part of a medical plans
contract and summary plan description. However, some large companies
separately negotiate the prescription coverage with a specialty provider. If
this arrangement is not part of the medical plan and has its own contract and
summary plan description, then the Cobra beneficiary could select one plan or
the other, or both.
Initial notice of Cobra to active employees is absolutely mandatory.
An employer must have documentation that all active employees were notified
at home about their rights and beneficiary rights upon loss or reduction in
coverage. If there is no proof of this notice, than there is an obligation of
the employer to provide coverage to a Cobra eligible beneficiary even if that
beneficiary elects coverage after the 60 day grace period.
Legislative Update VI WHY US HEALTHCARE COSTS ARE RISING?
US Healthcare Trends:
In 1980 the United States spent about $1052 per person on healthcare. By 1993, healthcare costs had soared to $3350 per person. This
growth in costs have led to the the widespread growth of managed care and HMO style medical plans and reimbursements. Managed
care did slow healthcare spending to less than inflation from 1993 to date and saved employers and employees more than $300 billion
per year. The savings boosted paychecks, reduced taxes, and made it possible for employers to hire more people. Today, California
premiums are 30% below those on the East Coast, where managed care is less established. Medical costs are on the rise again for the
following reasons.
Aging Population:
Americans are living longer. While this is certainly good news it also means increased use of hospitals and other medical care. Health
care needs for people over 65 are three times greater than those of younger people. And Baby Boomers will require more medical care
as they move into their 50's. Impact - 2%
Advances in Medical Technology:
Diagnostics and therapeutic technologies are improving quickly, and breakthroughs are occurring every day. Patients and doctors
demand the latest technology. Hospitals purchase the latest equipment to stay competitive. The cost of keeping up with technological
advances is high. Impact 8-10%
Legislative/Regulatory Changes:
Recent legislative and regulatory changes will increase the cost of healthcare in California by at least 2%. However well-intentioned,
mandated benefits and increased scrutiny of health plans and care providers make it harder for individuals and their employers to afford
healthcare coverage. Impact - 2%
Rising Labor Costs:
More than half of healthcare dollars are used to pay health professionals and support staff. Like the rest of the population these people
need pay increases to keep up with the increasing cost of living. Impact - 3%
Gardner G. Cook
Principal Consultant
Cook & Associates
Phone 707-935-7362
Fax 707-933-9131
ggc@cookandassociates.org
|