![]() |
|
Project Rubric |
CRITERIA |
EXEMPLARY [A] |
DISTINGUISHED [B] |
PROFICIENT [C] |
MINIMAL[D] |
CONTENT |
Effectively addresses one of
the essential questions Shows deep understanding
Provides valuable, accurate information on the subject. |
Meets most of the
criteria described under EXEMPLARY but may miss the mark occasionally. |
Addresses one of
the essential questions Shows some understanding
Provides adequate information on the subject. |
Presentation has serious
deficiencies in one or more areas. |
EXECUTION OF FORMAT |
Mechanics are nearly
perfect. Project is logically
Visuals are interesting and
Project is original and
Project shows evidence of
Group members participate
|
Addresses one of
the essential questions Shows some understanding
Provides adequate information on the subject. Has some mechanical errors, but not enough to interfere with understanding. Visuals are neat and show that care has been taken. Project is the original work of the presenters and avoids plagiarism. Some unevenness in group participation may be evident. |
||
PRESENTATION |
Presentation is well-
rehearsed and presenters rarely glance at notecards. Presenters are enthusiastic
Eye contact is frequent.
Voices are loud and clear. All presenters can field questions with ease. |
Presentation is organized
and shows evidence of planning. Presenters can be heard and understood and occasionally
Notecards are used. Presenters can field questions adequately. |