From: Philip J. Koenig <See_email_@ddress_below.This_one_is.invalid>
Newsgroups: ba.internet
Subject: Re: "Congress mulls prison terms for KaZaA users"
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 05:06:22 -0700

[quoted text excised]

So there seem to be 2 strong patterns here:
              
1)      Poster makes assertion
              
        JN disagrees, throws in irrelevant accusation, unwarranted
	logical leap.        
              
        OP says "I didn't say that, wasn't discussing that"
              
        JN says "How dare you define the debate, you're censoring opposing              
        points of view!

2)      Poster makes assertion X
              
        JN says "I disagree, because of Z"
              
        OP says "You're wrong, Z is not true, here's the corroborating
	facts"
              
        JN says "that's all irrelevant, we weren't talking about X
	anyway"