Outpatient Psychotherapy Plan Design, Managed Care, and a Point of Service Triple Option

Table of Contents

 

Preface

AHP Preface - By Georgia Berland, Executive Director of the Association for Humanistic Psychology

Additional Preface - By Larry M. Leitner, Ph.D., Professor of Clinical Psychology, Miami University

 

Abstract

 

CHAPTER 1: Introduction

 

CHAPTER 2: Literature Review

History of the growth of U.S. managed care medical and mental health plans

Managed care health plans and the rising cost of health care

Health care systems in transition

Managed care mental health plans

Residential treatment cost savings

Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) philosophy enters full outpatient psychotherapy care

Miller's "first generation" plans

Miller's "second generation" plans

The coming of "carve-out" managed care mental health organizations

Miller's "third generation" plans

Two realities

Four losses

Inadvertent consequences of applying managed care to outpatient mental health care

Tables 1A and 1B: Data from therapist assessment of managed care – Tucker and Lubin national study

Loss 1

Consumers have lost the right to choose their own clinicians for outpatient mental health treatment

Loss 2

Outpatient mental health clinicians have lost access to many prospective consumers' health plans (no covered reimbursement anticipated for that consumer's treatment)

Loss 3

Loss of right by consumer and clinician to choose their way of doing therapy during their covered outpatient mental health treatment

Role of short-term treatment methods

Loss 4

Loss by both parties of right to determine duration of covered treatment

Three developments leading to the present

Framing the study’s research questions and hypotheses

Stated as research questions

Stated as hypotheses

Limitations and delimitations

Limitations

Delimitations

 

CHAPTER 3: Methods

1.   Design of a Point of Service Triple Option outpatient managed care mental health plan

2.   Feasibility study of POSTO cost-neutrality

3.   Focus group (also functioning as a stakeholder expert group and as an idealized systems design imaging group)

4.   Focus group research use of Likert scales

5.   Qualitative focus group transcript content study

Selection of participants for the focus group

Desirable characteristics

Table 1: Stakeholder categories: One or more a necessary background for focus group members

Choosing group participants

List of focus group members who agreed to the April 1999 Berkeley focus group meeting

Rationale for using a half-day focus group to study: (a) four losses, (b) the POSTO outpatient mental health plan design, (c) the participants' own fundamental thinking emerging together

Emergence of stakeholder opinion

Distance

Rich body of data

Client satisfaction

Group size

Preparing for the focus group meeting

Table 2: The study's sources of evidence to confirm or disconfirm the hypotheses

Table 3: Subjects studied by each research method

 

CHAPTER 4: POINT OF SERVICE TRIPLE OPTION MANAGED CARE OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH PLAN DESIGN

Point Of Service Triple Option (POSTO) plan design and

the four losses

Improving on Loss 1

Improving on Loss 2

Improving on Loss 3

Improving on Loss 4

The two stages over time of the potential development of remediation for the four losses

Stage 1

Stage 2

The participant can choose option #1 at point of service:

Managed care HMO-style panel and peer case management

The participant can choose option #2 at point of service:

Managed care PPO panel with peer case management

The participant can choose option #3 at point of service

In the study’s focus group

 

CHAPTER 5: EXPLORATION OF A POSSIBLE COST-NEUTRALITY (VIS-A-VIS CURRENT PLANS) IN A POINT OF SERVICE TRIPLE OPTION MANAGED CARE OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH PLAN DESIGN

I. Problem formulation

II. Design and justification

III. Assumptions about hypothetical models of health plans involved in the study

A POSTO outpatient mental health plan past example found in the field: Dr. Nick Cummings' model at American Biodyne

IV. Designing a point of service triple option (POSTO) managed care mental health plan to seek reasonable inner-plan premium cost neutrality among the three Options in the plan

V. Model for calculating managed care mental health POSTO costs and payments

Table 1: Hypothetical POSTO managed care outpatient psychotherapy plan: Consumer chooses among all licensed outpatient psychotherapy clinicians along the following model

Outpatient psychotherapy clinician cost, consumer cost, and cost to the health plan

Table 2: Most common per outpatient therapy visit rates in and near Sonoma County

Elements down and across the experimental grid

Table 3: Visit Fees

Reserving money in the outpatient psychotherapy budget for the potential scenario of moderately increased visits

Outpatient psychotherapy clinician cost, consumer (plan participant/patient/client) cost, and cost to the health plan

Table 4 $70/hour therapist fees

Table 5 $100/hour

Table 6 $110/hour

Notes to the calculations

 

CHAPTER 6: FOUR LOSSES, THREE OPTIONS, AND SIX RECOMMENDATIONS

Four losses

Tables 1A and 1B: Did losses occur? Chart 1: Focus Group Hour 1

Tables 2A and 2B: If losses occurred, were they important losses?

Consideration of the feasibility that a POSTO managed care outpatient therapy plan could ameliorate any of the four listed losses

Tables 3A and 3B: Does POSTO outpatient psychotherapy benefit design offer an advantage (or disadvantage) in addressing this problem?

Consideration of the expert collaboration in the focus group on possible recommendations for future outpatient psychotherapy plan design

Tables 4A and 4B: Six participant recommendations for the future of covered outpatient psychotherapy plan design

Qualitative focus group transcript study

First hour: FOUR LOSSES

Cost crisis transition to managed care clarified

Subject: Loss #1 – Consumer losing the right to choose therapist

Subject: Loss #2: Therapist loss of relationship with the consumers health plan

Subject: Loss #3: Both lose right to choose therapy mode

Subject: Loss #4: Both suffer loss of right to choose therapy duration

Hour 2: POINT OF SERVICE TRIPLE OPTION (POSTO)

Table 5: POSTO: Help with the losses?

Hour 3: SIX RECOMMENDATIONS

Table 6: Six Recommendations

Recommendation #1: Consumer learning

Recommendation #2 Education: preventive and lifestyle

Recommendation #3: Mind-body treatment

Recommendation #4: Increase medical cost knowledge, including with and without good mental health treatment

Recommendation #5: Increase quality assurance, including the role of providers

Recommendation #6: Provide for needs of special populations

Results

Answering the study’s research questions

Final thoughts

 

References

 

Appendices

Appendix 1: Developing and costing a cost-neutral Point of service triple option managed care outpatient mental health plan by Chris Alesso

Appendix 2: Implications for further research: Medical cost offset

Appendix 3: Glossary

Appendix 4: Blank Likert scales for each of the three hours

 

You are visitor number

 

Website by: Chakra 5 studios

 

Top